<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canonical&#8217;s Ubuntu Server Ambitions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.workswithu.com/2007/10/10/canonicals-ubuntu-server-ambitions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2007/10/10/canonicals-ubuntu-server-ambitions/</link>
	<description>WorksWithU is the independent guide to Ubuntu Linux</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 19:54:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2007/10/10/canonicals-ubuntu-server-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workswithu.contentrobot.com/2007/10/10/canonicals-ubuntu-server-ambitions/#comment-225</guid>
		<description>I also agree. The other thing that Ubuntu server has over Red Hat is that you don&#039;t have to pay anything to get ubuntu server. If you want support, then you buy that, but the software itself is free. That is going to get Ubuntu through a lot of doors that the $750 a yr. red hat subscription won&#039;t fit through. This kind of grass roots server implementation model I think will help it grow much faster than if they tried to take Red Hat head on. Yeah, they won&#039;t get service contracts on a good chunk of those users, but they will get increased brand loyalty and the help of the un-affiliated developers out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree. The other thing that Ubuntu server has over Red Hat is that you don&#8217;t have to pay anything to get ubuntu server. If you want support, then you buy that, but the software itself is free. That is going to get Ubuntu through a lot of doors that the $750 a yr. red hat subscription won&#8217;t fit through. This kind of grass roots server implementation model I think will help it grow much faster than if they tried to take Red Hat head on. Yeah, they won&#8217;t get service contracts on a good chunk of those users, but they will get increased brand loyalty and the help of the un-affiliated developers out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Richardson</title>
		<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2007/10/10/canonicals-ubuntu-server-ambitions/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://workswithu.contentrobot.com/2007/10/10/canonicals-ubuntu-server-ambitions/#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Joe:

I couldn&#039;t agree more.  It is certainly a great development, and can pave the way for Linux into small businesses.  I posted to my legal technology blog on this today tying in to earlier posts on Linux in the Law Office.

http://lawtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/ubuntu-linux-servers-major-vendors/

Steve Richardson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe:</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more.  It is certainly a great development, and can pave the way for Linux into small businesses.  I posted to my legal technology blog on this today tying in to earlier posts on Linux in the Law Office.</p>
<p><a href="http://lawtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/ubuntu-linux-servers-major-vendors/" rel="nofollow">http://lawtech.wordpress.com/2007/10/10/ubuntu-linux-servers-major-vendors/</a></p>
<p>Steve Richardson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
