Governments: Starting to Vote For Ubuntu Linux?
Governments continue to march toward open source. The Dutch government last year committed to use open standards, the French government has deployed Kubuntu desktops to over 1,000 members of parliament and staff, and a few days ago the United Kingdom government announced an Open Source action plan. The plan, entitled ‘Open Source, Open Standards and Re-Use‘, calls to ensure that open source solutions be fully and fairly considered for public sector IT projects and emphasises the requirement for sharing and re-use of code to reduce costs and drive common solutions.
Finally governments are realising that open source has benefits beyond initial cost savings. They are discovering the freedom to share and re-use open source solutions is more cost-efficient in the long run. To quote Richard Stallman (founder of the GNU project and Free Software Foundation), FOSS essentially means “free as in free speech, not as in free beer.”
Now, code re-use is great if you are a government and commission many large IT projects. You can be safe in the knowledge that five or 10 years down the line when your system needs upgrading, you are not going to have to start again from scratch or pay over the nose because you are locked in to proprietary code. You can evolve and re-use your existing tried and tested open source solution.
Voting For Ubuntu
So where does Ubuntu figure in this? If an open source solution has been chosen and implemented for the server side, there is every chance that an open source solution will be chosen for the client side. That means Linux on the desktop.
Since most public sector IT support staff are likely not to be familiar yet with supporting a Linux desktop (though I am sure this will change with time), the chosen solution will need the backing of support.
Ubuntu is one of the few desktop Linux solutions that comes with the option of paid support from Canonical and their partners. If Ubuntu is deployed as the client Operating System, it can be done so with the piece of mind not only that you are deploying a stable, robust OS free from proprietary licensing, but that if it all goes horribly wrong, you can fall back to Canonical and pay someone there to fix it.
Contributing blogger Guy Thouret is a software engineer for a wireless energy management system company. He has used various GNU/Linux distributions since 2002.
WorksWithU is updated multiple times per week. Don’t miss a single post. Sign up for our RSS and Twitter feeds (available now) and newsletter (coming in 2009).
WorksWithU on Identi.ca
WorksWithU on Twitter
WorksWithU's RSS Feed
Go Ubuntu Go!
I have often wondered why in the US, more schools at least don’t use open source projects. Our local district just received come old computers, and what did they do they took the free computers and went and paid for XP licenses on those old computers. A real waste of money when Ubuntu would have more than done the job.
@Wesley: some don’t know. Some have windows fans as admins. Others lack linux expertise to deploy them.
@Wesley:
MS also has an educational contract that allows schools XP licenses at low cost, provided that they pay for a license on every single computer in the school. Hence, even if they had installed Ubuntu, they would have been bound by the contract to pay for XP. Certainly, this is how schools generally acquire their Windows OS in the UK. Since the advent of Vista, this has caused problems; since schools are now finding they either have to upgrade all hardware at the same time to meet Vista’s requirements, or have a mixed deployment of Vista / XP. I am sure other publicly run departments have had similar issues. Hopefully, the UK government’s stance will have more effect than BECTA’s prior positive review of FOSS (which had no effect at all).
ugm6hr: I’m not for sure how the license work here but I suspect it is probably the same. It is encouraging to see some governments see the benefit of open source. Hopefully that trend will continue.
Its coming to a point when all this Microsoft licensing sounds like extortion. It’s like the kind of insurance policy you need to pay the neighborhood hoodlum to keep your kneecaps from accidentally running into a baseball bat. ugm6hr, in the public court of opinion that kind of licensing sounds anti-competitive. Then I wish that more people get exposed to Linux through government adoption.