<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu Could Profit From Both Yahoo, Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.workswithu.com/2010/01/26/ubuntu-could-profit-from-both-yahoo-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2010/01/26/ubuntu-could-profit-from-both-yahoo-google/</link>
	<description>WorksWithU is the independent guide to Ubuntu Linux</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:44:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ssj6akshat</title>
		<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2010/01/26/ubuntu-could-profit-from-both-yahoo-google/comment-page-1/#comment-7623</link>
		<dc:creator>ssj6akshat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 07:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1749#comment-7623</guid>
		<description>This Canonical-is-Greedy thing is useless 
Canonical is a For-Profit company and it is still in loss so it is natural for them to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This Canonical-is-Greedy thing is useless<br />
Canonical is a For-Profit company and it is still in loss so it is natural for them to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo-Erlend Schinstad</title>
		<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2010/01/26/ubuntu-could-profit-from-both-yahoo-google/comment-page-1/#comment-7616</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo-Erlend Schinstad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1749#comment-7616</guid>
		<description>ssj6akshat: you&#039;re wrong. Distrubution upgrades can change default settings to match the new default. If you&#039;ve set a search engine yourself, then it will not be changed. 

I don&#039;t like Yahoo much myself, but the wild objections here, make no sense to me. I takes only a couple of _seconds_ to change to the search engine you prefer. It&#039;s just a matter of clicking the dropdown menu next to the search field in Firefox, selecting Google or whatever, and you&#039;re done. 

People who are willing to change to another operating system because of this, should probably do some soul searching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ssj6akshat: you&#8217;re wrong. Distrubution upgrades can change default settings to match the new default. If you&#8217;ve set a search engine yourself, then it will not be changed. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like Yahoo much myself, but the wild objections here, make no sense to me. I takes only a couple of _seconds_ to change to the search engine you prefer. It&#8217;s just a matter of clicking the dropdown menu next to the search field in Firefox, selecting Google or whatever, and you&#8217;re done. </p>
<p>People who are willing to change to another operating system because of this, should probably do some soul searching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssj6akshat</title>
		<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2010/01/26/ubuntu-could-profit-from-both-yahoo-google/comment-page-1/#comment-7597</link>
		<dc:creator>ssj6akshat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 08:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1749#comment-7597</guid>
		<description>@aikiwolfie:An update can&#039;t change your search engine to yahoo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@aikiwolfie:An update can&#8217;t change your search engine to yahoo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aikiwolfie</title>
		<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2010/01/26/ubuntu-could-profit-from-both-yahoo-google/comment-page-1/#comment-7595</link>
		<dc:creator>aikiwolfie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1749#comment-7595</guid>
		<description>If Canonical switches to Yahoo as the default for Firefox I&#039;ll switch it back. If they change it again against my will with updates I&#039;ll either ditch the version in the repos and install my own or I&#039;ll just ditch Ubuntu.

I know Canonical needs to earn a crust. But this just seems desperate. Why would you hook up with a search engine in decline even with the backing of a company as big as Microsoft? It just doesn&#039;t make sense. Canonical have definitely made a wrong turn here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Canonical switches to Yahoo as the default for Firefox I&#8217;ll switch it back. If they change it again against my will with updates I&#8217;ll either ditch the version in the repos and install my own or I&#8217;ll just ditch Ubuntu.</p>
<p>I know Canonical needs to earn a crust. But this just seems desperate. Why would you hook up with a search engine in decline even with the backing of a company as big as Microsoft? It just doesn&#8217;t make sense. Canonical have definitely made a wrong turn here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darryl</title>
		<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2010/01/26/ubuntu-could-profit-from-both-yahoo-google/comment-page-1/#comment-7591</link>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:46:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1749#comment-7591</guid>
		<description>Really, I cannot see anywhere in the GPL that states restrictions on how people use or configure their particular distro.

Im sure there is not a clause in the GPL about not being allowed to do anything with Microsoft or any other company.

Just because you dont like a particular company, what right do you have or the FSF to make extra demands regarding who uses what, when, or how.

This is the kind of issue (non issue) that continuously hurt FOSS. It&#039;s seems to be NOT about freedom anymore, it&#039;s seems to be about control and restricting you&#039;re freedoms.

FOSS, uses things like SAMBA to interact with Microsoft and their protocols but you dont complain about that.

It&#039;s like all this Novell rubbish, where in the GPL does it state that you cannot do business with MS ?

And complaining about it, increases the FUD levels for FOSS, sure there is Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt if you happen to do business with any company that RMS or the FSF or anyone else &quot;in the community&quot; does not like, you can expect to be attacked, and mabey even the GPL itself will be modified to ensure the FSF&#039;s power or control, and the continued restrictions of our freedoms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, I cannot see anywhere in the GPL that states restrictions on how people use or configure their particular distro.</p>
<p>Im sure there is not a clause in the GPL about not being allowed to do anything with Microsoft or any other company.</p>
<p>Just because you dont like a particular company, what right do you have or the FSF to make extra demands regarding who uses what, when, or how.</p>
<p>This is the kind of issue (non issue) that continuously hurt FOSS. It&#8217;s seems to be NOT about freedom anymore, it&#8217;s seems to be about control and restricting you&#8217;re freedoms.</p>
<p>FOSS, uses things like SAMBA to interact with Microsoft and their protocols but you dont complain about that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like all this Novell rubbish, where in the GPL does it state that you cannot do business with MS ?</p>
<p>And complaining about it, increases the FUD levels for FOSS, sure there is Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt if you happen to do business with any company that RMS or the FSF or anyone else &#8220;in the community&#8221; does not like, you can expect to be attacked, and mabey even the GPL itself will be modified to ensure the FSF&#8217;s power or control, and the continued restrictions of our freedoms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bc</title>
		<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2010/01/26/ubuntu-could-profit-from-both-yahoo-google/comment-page-1/#comment-7558</link>
		<dc:creator>bc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 02:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1749#comment-7558</guid>
		<description>I use Linux largely because of concerns over the anti-competitive practises of MS and believe there are quite a few with similar feelings.  It will be unfortunate  if Canonical gets paid per search and my (our?) choice costs Canonical much needed revenue-but avoiding increasing the MS market share will take priority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Linux largely because of concerns over the anti-competitive practises of MS and believe there are quite a few with similar feelings.  It will be unfortunate  if Canonical gets paid per search and my (our?) choice costs Canonical much needed revenue-but avoiding increasing the MS market share will take priority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sola</title>
		<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2010/01/26/ubuntu-could-profit-from-both-yahoo-google/comment-page-1/#comment-7542</link>
		<dc:creator>sola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1749#comment-7542</guid>
		<description>Even if some money goes back to Microsoft, this may be a good move.

Look it this way: Microsoft - through Bing - supports the development of Ubuntu which, in turn, reduces Windows market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if some money goes back to Microsoft, this may be a good move.</p>
<p>Look it this way: Microsoft &#8211; through Bing &#8211; supports the development of Ubuntu which, in turn, reduces Windows market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex</title>
		<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2010/01/26/ubuntu-could-profit-from-both-yahoo-google/comment-page-1/#comment-7540</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 19:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1749#comment-7540</guid>
		<description>The benefits to Microsoft far outweigh any benefit to the Linux community.

What Microsoft gets is increased market share for its Bong search engine. That&#039;s what it needs to both advertise its success and to increase advertising revenue on Bong. 

Canonical gets some revenue.

Linux users get the joy of benefiting Microsoft.

Fedora, here I come.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The benefits to Microsoft far outweigh any benefit to the Linux community.</p>
<p>What Microsoft gets is increased market share for its Bong search engine. That&#8217;s what it needs to both advertise its success and to increase advertising revenue on Bong. </p>
<p>Canonical gets some revenue.</p>
<p>Linux users get the joy of benefiting Microsoft.</p>
<p>Fedora, here I come.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: logan</title>
		<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2010/01/26/ubuntu-could-profit-from-both-yahoo-google/comment-page-1/#comment-7539</link>
		<dc:creator>logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 13:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1749#comment-7539</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for a linux company making money.  But regardless of how the money flows, it will make it back to microsoft, as yahoo is in bed with them.  

How much longer until we are changing everything in linux to suit corporate interests.  It starts here, next thing you know there will be more concern about corporate interests than user experience and user choice.

I think this is a start to bad.

In my opinion, I think linux distros should leave the applications options/features intact as the maker of the application intended.  Who is Ubuntu to decide what default search engine firefox has.  But please, rape away mozillas right of distributing their product the way they intended, so canonical can make a dime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for a linux company making money.  But regardless of how the money flows, it will make it back to microsoft, as yahoo is in bed with them.  </p>
<p>How much longer until we are changing everything in linux to suit corporate interests.  It starts here, next thing you know there will be more concern about corporate interests than user experience and user choice.</p>
<p>I think this is a start to bad.</p>
<p>In my opinion, I think linux distros should leave the applications options/features intact as the maker of the application intended.  Who is Ubuntu to decide what default search engine firefox has.  But please, rape away mozillas right of distributing their product the way they intended, so canonical can make a dime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam akbar</title>
		<link>http://www.workswithu.com/2010/01/26/ubuntu-could-profit-from-both-yahoo-google/comment-page-1/#comment-7538</link>
		<dc:creator>adam akbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.workswithu.com/?p=1749#comment-7538</guid>
		<description>canonical still a company that need money, i think its make a sense that canonical will make relationship with yahoo!, its just default browser, we always can change it right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>canonical still a company that need money, i think its make a sense that canonical will make relationship with yahoo!, its just default browser, we always can change it right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
